Not that if you look at it through a kid's perspective
It was definitely made for the kid's toon audience,
but I have to say I liked it for the most part.
The animation isn't too shabby, the musical
scores and scenes are good. I guess what takes
people the wrong way is the use of comedy,
and fantasy (the cat tearing up the statues
while the King sings) and some other issues
with characters.
Yes it's not the 1956 version with Yul, nothing
will top that but it's still not that bad as
far as remakes and different versions go.
I would recommend if you have kids and you want
to introduce to a fun film with references
to the original which blends in some Middle Eastern
culture and values.
Thought This would be more kid-friendly than the original film--WRONG!!!
My kids (ages 5 & 8) are learning about Rodgers and Hammerstein. I wasn't sure if the original King & I film would hold their interest, and was excited to see this animated version. Do NOT waste your time on this cartoon. It is horrid. There are a couple characters that are really grating and annoying (a monkey (cringe) and an "Ah-so" stereotype-Charlie Chan-without-the-brains-buddha-shaped-bald character). I thought MAYBE the music would redeem the film, but during each song there are so many busy, noisy, pratfalls and slapstick that you can't even enjoy the songs! They've gratuituously added dragons, hot air ballons, rescue scenes, unfunny "humor," (all presumably to hold the kids' interest) but it just gets on one's nerves. My kids did not care for it, either.
FANTASTIC!
My daughter was three when she first watched this and she enjoyed it so much that I plan to buy it very soon. You say the story was rushed? How long do you think a child's attention span is? It was great and I truly hope that Warner Brothers continues to make these type of movies. Especially great for any children who love to sing and dance like mine.
Click to Editorial Reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment